9/12/2023 0 Comments Stager adobe![]() ![]() I believe, there are no 'rigged' models or any possibility of any 'people' things. ![]() My feeling is, Substance 3D Stager is more for 'product' virtual photography. So, I have to stick to relatively easy and cheaper tools like Daz and SketchUp + you for replying. Further, I have looked at the high tools like Maya, which are beyond my scope and ability and pricing right now. So, would Substance 3D Stager, be a good next step for me? I have already sampled SketchUp and V-Ray, which looks good. Ultimately, I just want to explore photorealism as a hobby, and I want to learn more tools, simply as a hobby. and I am sure, there will be ways to import 3D models from online marketplaces. What fascinates me is that, Stager has a 'collision' system which means, real physics interaction between models. Mix and match models, and arrange them and do some photo realistic renders. The video reminds of Daz more than anything else. They have put a nice little video right there on the front page. Now, I have bumped into Adobe Substance 3D Stager. I also understand, Blender has a lot of 'Arch Viz' plugins and ready to use scenes/assets that can be purchased for some super cool, photo real indoor/outdoor visualizations. I spent a few days on that, with the trial, and came off very impressed. However, I am also interested to learn what other 'photorealism' tools are out there which are easy to use, like Daz 3D.įor instance, I liked how easy to use Sketch Up + V Ray to create some super cool photorealistic building and neighborhood scenes. It's fun playing around with attractive female figures in a variety of clothing and posing them around. I have always felt Daz 3D is like a 'first' step into the world of photorealism. I just have a general set of questions/thoughts and wanted to bounce off some ideas before I start paying Adobe so much for this thing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |